By Jason English
Thirty people showed up to a Barns Courtney show in New York with kazoos. They stormed the stage during "99," buzzed all over the chorus, and made the song sound, in Barns' own words, "like shit." He told them so. Then he kept playing.
This is not how a billion-stream artist is supposed to operate. There is no step-and-repeat, no chaperoned meet-and-greet, no professional distance. There is a guy on tour calling his own show "a rolling dumpster fire" and crawling across the floor in Phoenix to investigate a stinkbug. There is also, quietly, one of the clearest examples I've come across of what the 2026 State of Music survey actually concluded: the artists surviving this era are the ones who stopped trying to be visible and started trying to be present.
I talked to Barns the morning he kicked off the European leg of his tour from Ireland. Glasgow, Manchester, London, Paris, all the way to Poland. By the end of our conversation I had stopped thinking of him as a UK rocker with a sync hit in Burnt and started thinking of him as a case study for a survey I thought was about other people.
The $8.16 problem he names out loud
The survey is built on 573 fan and artist responses, and the most uncomfortable number in it is this one: after the venue, promoter, agent, gas, hotels, and crew take their share, an artist nets about $8.16 from a $100 ticket. Seventy-seven percent of fan spending goes to live music. Almost none of it sticks to the artist.
I asked Barns how he balances the math of touring against the size of his audience. His answer was the most honest version of what every working musician knows:
"At the level that I'm selling tickets, you literally end up with either no money at the end of the tour from the ticket sales or you end up in debt from the ticket sales."
He has a billion streams. He still comes off tour underwater on tickets alone.
This is the part the industry headlines bury. Nominal revenue is up to $28.6 billion. Adjusted for inflation, the business is still $11.6 billion below its 1999 peak. Live Nation pulled $25.2 billion in 2025 and ran a 3.3% margin on the concerts themselves. The real money is in the sponsorships around the show, where margins hit 64%. The concert is the loss leader. The artist is the loss leader.
Barns' answer to the math is something the survey calls the Willingness Ladder, and it shows up in his calendar as dinner.
The dinner party that funds the tour
Somewhere on this run, Barns started replacing the VIP photo op with a VIP dinner. Fans buy in. He shows up. They eat.
"I just love dinner parties. I love any excuse to go to a beautiful restaurant and devote myself entirely to the pleasures of the table, surrounded by people that just wanna talk about music. The nice thing about the dinners is that ancient biblical idea of breaking bread makes everyone feel relaxed and like we're all on the same level."
He told me he switched to dinners because the meet-and-greets felt awkward, and fans came in expecting a step-and-repeat. "How can I make it more like the estranged family that we actually are?" he said. The dinners did two things at once. They made his job feel like a life again. And, in his words:
"By coming to the dinners, they are literally making it possible for me to do my job."
That is the Willingness Ladder in one sentence. The survey found that fans paying $25 or more per month for music are 2.4x more likely to follow artists on social and 8 times more likely to prioritize live, in-person engagement. Eighty-five percent of those fans spend $150 a year or more on live shows. They are not "tapped out." They are the only economic engine in the building, and what they want is a longer table.
It's the same insight underneath Red Stool Sessions, our backyard show in Roswell. In a normal venue, 91.8% of the ticket price goes to overhead. In a living room, that math inverts.
The Content Trap, in his own words
Artists are told to spend their time on the channel that produces the least valuable fans. Ninety percent of an artist's hours go to social. Only 5% of fans say they discovered their favorite artist on social. Radio-discovered fans convert to a paid ticket at an 86% rate. Social-discovered fans don't come close.
Barns has tried Instagram. He's tried stories. He's tried being clever. He told me he didn't enjoy any of it.
"It wasn't until I started spending huge amounts of time on Twitch in a place where fans could message me back immediately in real time, that I started to feel like, yeah, this is a real experience. And the difference in the shows has been palpable."
The Twitch room talks back, organizes itself, and planned the 30 kazoos. Discord and Patreon plug into the same community. That is where his "qualified" fans live, and the dinners are where they pay the rent.
Compare that to the artist posting 90 Reels a week into a feed of people who will never buy a ticket. The math is not even close.
Why a prompt can't make "Glitter & Gold"
I asked Barns where he sits on AI. He didn't flinch.
"A rising tide raises all ships. Everyone thought Auto-Tune would be the death of singers. It wasn't. Hacks will always be blatantly obvious as hacks, and innovators will always figure out how to take the technology of the time to places that we don't expect."
Then he quoted David Bowie on Jeremy Paxman in 1999, when Bowie was asked about a new technology called “The Internet.”
"It's an alien being that hasn't even landed yet. We don't even know what it's capable of."
And he made a point I have not heard another artist make this cleanly: if everyone in the world can type a subject and spit out a song, that ceases to be entertaining. Novelty collapses. The market re-prices toward the work that a prompt can't reproduce.
That is the entire defense against the survey's most ominous finding, which is that streaming made music feel free and AI threatens to make it feel disposable. Sixty-one percent of fans said they would pay more if they knew the artist was being compensated fairly. What they want is to be closer to the artist. A model cannot give them that.
The wilderness years
Barns spent the back half of his early twenties signed to a deal that wouldn't let him release music and handing out free iced tea in a muscle suit. He calls it the wilderness. I'd call it a dark forest. He calls the album that came out of it the most honest thing he's ever written.
"Without the incredibly dark time in my life, when I lost my first deal and I didn't know if I'd make music again, I never would've written my first album. Sometimes it takes being smashed open by very difficult circumstances to be able to deliver something that is really true."
If you've listened to The Attractions of Youth, you can hear the bones of the iced-tea years in it. Fists on filing cabinets. Sticks on tile floors. A laptop in a decommissioned old folks' home in North Tottenham. That is what the survey is pointing at when it says the artist's only defense against a flattening industry is the work that is too specific to optimize.
The streaming era rewards the middle. Barns has spent a decade writing his way around it.
What Barns is Chasing
Toward the end of our conversation I asked him what he was curious about right now, at this point in his career. He didn't talk about a chart, a placement, or a deal.
"I wanna see if I can touch the hem of Bowie's gown atop Mount Immortality."
Then he paraphrased Bukowski. Live well, live so well that death will tremble to take us.
A billion streams, a sweaty room of fans with kazoos, a dinner table funding the bus, a Twitch room that organizes itself, and a guy in Ireland telling me money is "a token for buying experiences." That is the survey's conclusion in human form. The math of the industry got worse. The artists who treat their fans like an estranged family are the ones still on the road.
If you only know him from "Fire" or "Glitter & Gold," go listen to Live & Wired now that it is out, or to anything from the wilderness era. Better yet, book a dinner with him.
Listen & Watch

CURIOUS GOLDFISH PODCAST
Emerging from the Wilderness: A Chat with Barns Courtney